As Gun Insurance scheme FLOUNDERS… as FPC joins the fight in San Jose mandated gun insurance…

As Gun Insurance scheme FLOUNDERS… as FPC joins the fight in San Jose mandated gun insurance…

#2a #guncontrol #biden #democrats
Previous video: https://youtu.be/Ci_4E3_lBRI
In today’s episode of the Bullet Points, we take a look at yet ANOTHER nail in the coffin for the mandated Gun Insurance in San Jose. So far, there have been lawsuits from National gun Rights groups, state level tax groups, and now Firearms Policy Coalition has joined the fray with a lawsuit all their own. The shaky bridge is sure to come down soon… Let’s discuss people!

Article for Reference:

https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/2nd-amendment-lawsuit-filed-against-san-jose-over-gun-ordinance/

50 Comments

  1. Edward Stowers on August 17, 2022 at 7:56 pm

    They need laws to prosecute anyone who submits or enforces unConstitutional law since the Constitution is the bedrock of all law in the US. If anyone suppresses citizen’s rights, they are guilty of a crime, particularly if they are in government.



  2. Snap Count on August 17, 2022 at 7:56 pm

    Id love to see someone sue the State and Federal Governments for imposing a sales tax on firearms. The sales tax should be viewed as a tax on your 2A rights.



  3. Biff Johnson on August 17, 2022 at 7:57 pm

    Leave it to California politics to f over the people of that state



  4. Jim W on August 17, 2022 at 7:57 pm

    I also believe that this violates the 4th and 5th amendments as well.



  5. rplampe on August 17, 2022 at 7:58 pm

    Yaay 2 a



  6. M McCarthy on August 17, 2022 at 8:01 pm

    FPC is by far the most effective pro-2A legal team in the country.



  7. Jim Combs on August 17, 2022 at 8:01 pm

    I am so sick of these anti 2A elitists, telling me what rights I have, where, and when I can exercise them, they need to be put in their places!  I propose the following:
    1) Any government, business, or property owner prohibiting the lawful possession/carrying of a self defense weapon, must provide adequate protective measures to provide the same or higher level of protection that the individual would/could/should have been able to provide for them selves. 
    2) Any politician that proposes, sponsors/cosponsors, votes for, or enacts an unconstitutional ordinance, mandate, bill, rule, regulation, or law will be guilty of treasonous activity, punishable by removal from office, banned from ever holding elected/appointed office for life, fines totaling their salary during their elected/appointed term +5 years, and prisoned for not less than 5 years. 
    3) Any group, civil or political in nature that, by their actions or charter prohibit, or attempt to prohibit lawful/constitutional activities or that violate any part or parts of the Bill of Rights will be subject to the terms laid out in section 2. 
    Of course, I’m not a lawyer, politician, or judge. I’m just a person sick and tired of this.



  8. D.j. on August 17, 2022 at 8:03 pm

    Always Great content!!!



  9. Rex McComb on August 17, 2022 at 8:05 pm

    We should hit them in their bank account. If it found to be unconstitutional we sue them for millions of dollars because of moneys spent to in force the law before it’s found unconstitutional



  10. Russell Jackson on August 17, 2022 at 8:08 pm

    Right on



  11. Daniel Carney on August 17, 2022 at 8:10 pm

    I wish it were possible to hold these politicians accountable for blatantly violating the constitution with their "work-arounds" on how to get around the constitution with regulations and fees that are not always established by non-elected bureaucrats. We used to go after people with communist or socialist views that want to tear down the process and foundations of this country in the exact same ways the progressive left does….. Progressive democrats are the new communists and socialists of the modern era



  12. Philip Duffy on August 17, 2022 at 8:11 pm

    I think this is ridiculous and a waste of good money.



  13. Ed Czach on August 17, 2022 at 8:13 pm

    Awesome news and great vidio!! United we stand all Patriots!!!!



  14. David Handyman on August 17, 2022 at 8:14 pm

    The anti-constitutional gunphobic politicians do not care how many law suits are against them. It is not their money. It is the people’s money they are spending to bolster their lawyer mates’ coffers. Blessings from Australia.



  15. Chris Garris on August 17, 2022 at 8:17 pm

    That’s right 2/3 vote..#FoundingFathers,#Republic.



  16. fred V on August 17, 2022 at 8:19 pm

    Shame we don’t have law that would allow us to sue the people that actually made these laws rather then the government so that they pay the penalty.



  17. lgwappo on August 17, 2022 at 8:19 pm

    I’ll bet the left is looking for more ways to tax our Constitution because they hate it.



  18. ElijahJohn888 on August 17, 2022 at 8:19 pm

    WHAT Ultimately THE PEOPLE NEED TO " WORRY " BE CONCERNED ABOUT IF ANYTHING IS ARE THEY SAVED. BOTH HEAVEN & HELL ARE EVERLASTING. IF U ARE NOT SAVED & U WANT TO BE JUST DO Romans 10:9 & 10 also verse 13 NO MORE OR NO LESS. I WOULD STRONGLY ADVICE THAT
    U DO NOT PUT OFF UNTIL TOMORROW WHAT U CAN & DO TODAY ! WAY…https://youtu.be/txL8uFtNZs4

    ~Maranatha~



  19. roxy views on August 17, 2022 at 8:20 pm

    Thanks for covering this, i live there and this is a quiet story here. My councilman is the only one to vote against it. I learned about the thing from The armed scholar, props to him too. I emailed my councilman and chewed her out for the unanimous vote to move it forward, she later flipped her vote…….idk, did she listen? Also in an email to her constituent’s she said the city thinks there are only about 54,000 gun owners in San Jose, hahahahhhaaa, wrong. Recall, at the same time king Newsom passed a bill to allow private study groups to have access to gun ownership data that CA collects. Namely UC Davis , on the cover, we’ll see where that goes. Possibly, SJ mayor was just throwing up a smoke screen for a favor to be returned.



  20. Charles Burton on August 17, 2022 at 8:22 pm

    I have insurance, because I choose to have insurance. And I enjoy the training. Gives me peace of mind. That’s the way it should be.



  21. Tim Mix on August 17, 2022 at 8:23 pm

    👍🖖



  22. John Kaiser on August 17, 2022 at 8:25 pm

    👍



  23. David Smith on August 17, 2022 at 8:26 pm

    I can’t find your account on Twitter. Can you provide a link?



  24. Bill Alumni on August 17, 2022 at 8:29 pm

    The above is the reason why people who live in Red states should support the patriots in Blue states. Stop this nonsense on the state level and it never even gets a sniff at the national level.



  25. Jeff D. on August 17, 2022 at 8:31 pm

    Gun owners in San Jose should sue the City Council for deprivation of rights.



  26. Kenneth Verkest on August 17, 2022 at 8:32 pm

    Hell yeah man I live in Ohio but this is excellent news keep up the good work man



  27. Zigbee Gooblesnort on August 17, 2022 at 8:37 pm

    Why would a freedom loving American live in the Soviet Socialist Republic of Californication 🇨🇳?



  28. Christopher Shea on August 17, 2022 at 8:37 pm

    Sue the dirtbag mayor directly. America’s dirtiest city.



  29. Dirk Bogarde on August 17, 2022 at 8:39 pm

    🇺🇸 1776 🇺🇸



  30. IronSeaBee Lost on August 17, 2022 at 8:40 pm

    Never, ever trust a democrat, rino and those from the government that are finding solutions to no problems.



  31. Mark Hannh on August 17, 2022 at 8:41 pm

    Love this page



  32. Michael Meyer on August 17, 2022 at 8:41 pm

    Thanks, Some good news👍🤠👍



  33. john.d. smith on August 17, 2022 at 8:42 pm

    puck that San Jose mayor 🤬



  34. Saga Vasa on August 17, 2022 at 8:43 pm

    Another stupid Commufornia government decision!



  35. cas9457 on August 17, 2022 at 8:43 pm

    The people should be allowed to sue this mayor and council people who approved this law at an individual level. If they would have to pay thousands of $$ out of their own personal pockets for laws that they know are unconstitutional they would think twice about pushing this crap. Also , nobody can step in and pay there fine of tens of thousands of $$. Bend them over and make it PAINFULLY HURT.



  36. egmjag on August 17, 2022 at 8:43 pm

    My friend who lives in the heart of the city wasn’t worried. He told me it wouldn’t pass when he first heard about this.



  37. Randy Torgerson on August 17, 2022 at 8:44 pm

    Cities, counties and states, need to stop wasting tax payers money by passing stupid laws they know is wrong. This is why taxpayers are sick and tired of paying taxes that are used to litigate their crazy ideas.



  38. John Smith on August 17, 2022 at 8:44 pm

    Drain the cities budget…



  39. Eric Haines on August 17, 2022 at 8:45 pm

    thanks for the hittin’ us with the information.
    you do good work.



  40. Jerry PEAL on August 17, 2022 at 8:46 pm

    I’ll just say no if it comes to my area no matter what !



  41. Jack Griffith on August 17, 2022 at 8:46 pm

    Oh C’mon! We’re talking San Jose California! These people don’t need liberty 🗽 freedom or rights of the people guaranteed to them by the US Constitution! And who in the world needs the rule of law anyway? All that old fashioned silliness!!😳😳😳😳



  42. David Scott on August 17, 2022 at 8:48 pm

    Tell them they have to spend the tax money on firearms education in schools so at least the citys children can grow up as responsible gun lovers



  43. keith moore on August 17, 2022 at 8:49 pm

    GUNS ARE INSURANCE!!! why do you need insurance on insurance??? we need to turn it back on them the militia act of 1792 clearly says all able bodied males need to have a gun 20 rounds of ammo, obviously they don;t we need to file CRIMINAL CHARGES for them violating the militia act!!



  44. benerval7 on August 17, 2022 at 8:50 pm

    All of that money dumped into lawsuites just to protect your rights … the same rights these "officials" are supposed to protect. Pathetic. Lawyers are making loads of money…so it will continue



  45. Jim Valentine on August 17, 2022 at 8:50 pm

    Forget that crap



  46. Tree Climber on August 17, 2022 at 8:51 pm

    🤡💥👊 Pow



  47. Bob Brace on August 17, 2022 at 8:51 pm

    Once again they are testing the waters to see what they can get away with.



  48. John Mcelfresh on August 17, 2022 at 8:51 pm

    would love to see them lose on gun control during a democratic presidency that would be to awesome



  49. the grim streaker on August 17, 2022 at 8:53 pm

    So what you’re saying is they want the people to pay them to oppose their rights, yeah that doesn’t seem suspect at all.



  50. Rodney Ronnow on August 17, 2022 at 8:55 pm

    👍👍👍💀